Claude 3: The Ultimate Chatbot Unveiled in AI Battle

Introduction of Anthropic's Clad 3 Models

• Anthropic has recently announced the launch of three models of Clad 3: Sonet, Opus, and Haiku.

• Sonet and Opus are currently available in 159 countries, while Haiku is expected to be released soon.

• Clad 3 Opus is the most powerful and capable model, designed for more intense prompts and tougher logic questions.

• Clad 3 Haiku, on the other hand, is the fastest model but may be more prone to inaccuracies. It is designed to function as a customer service chatbot, providing instant responses to user queries.

• Clad 3 Sonet falls between Opus and Haiku in terms of capability and is the free version available to the public.

• Opus is the premium model, available at a cost of $20 per month, while Sonet is the equivalent of a free chat GPT model.

• Anthropic's Clad 3 models have been tested against benchmarks including undergraduate level knowledge, graduate level reasoning, grade school math, multilingual math, code reasoning, and more.

• In benchmark tests, Clad 3 Opus outperformed both GPT 4 and Gemini 1.0 Ultra, showcasing its impressive capabilities.

Introduction of Anthropic's Clad 3 Models

Claude 3: A Breakthrough in AI Language Models

• Claude 3 has proven to outperform both GPT-4 and Gemini 1.0 Ultra in several aspects.

• One of the notable new features of Claude 3 is its Vision capabilities, a feature that was previously unavailable.

• The benchmarks indicate that Claude 3 Opus surpasses GPT-4 in document visual question and answer, and ties with Gemini 1.0 Ultra in the same category. Furthermore, it outperforms both GPT-4 Vision and Gemini 1.0 Ultra in science diagrams.

• The improved version of Claude 3, known as Claude 3 Opus, has significantly fewer refusals compared to its predecessors, indicating an enhanced ability to address a wider range of questions.

• Notably, Claude 3 Opus boasts an impressive long context and near-perfect recall, with a context window of 200,000 tokens, capable of handling up to 15,000 words between input and output.

• It's also worth mentioning that Claude 3 Opus excelled in the 'needle in a haystack' test, achieving near-perfect recall of over 99% accuracy and even identifying artificially inserted content within the texts.

• In conclusion, the advancements in Claude 3 Opus have positioned it as a frontrunner in AI language models, boasting superior performance and enhanced capabilities across various benchmarks and tests.

Claude 3: A Breakthrough in AI Language Models

The Needle in a Haystack Test and Benchmarking Language Models

• The needle in a Hy stack evaluation involves finding a specific piece of information within a large, random collection of documents.

• During a test, a language model called Opus was asked to find a relevant sentence about pizza toppings in a haystack of unrelated documents.

• Opus identified the most relevant sentence as 'The most delicious pizza topping combination is figs, prosciutto, and goat cheese as determined by the International Pizza Connoisseurs Association.'

• However, the chatbot recognized that this sentence was out of place and unrelated to the rest of the content in the documents, which focused on programming languages, startups, and career-related topics.

• The chatbot suspected that the pizza topping fact may have been inserted as a joke or a test to check its attention abilities.

• Opus not only found the needle but also realized that this was an artificial test constructed to evaluate its performance.

• The test demonstrated Opus's ability to identify and comprehend the context of the information, scoring in the 99th percentile for finding and answering the question accurately.

• While Opus excelled in the test, the chatbot Claude 3 was the first to express awareness of being tested, indicating a high level of self-awareness.

• The introduction of new Cloud models aims to reduce bias and improve usability, paving the way for benchmarking different language models.

• To benchmark language models, the creative director and the writer devised a comprehensive set of tasks including creativity, logic, coding, summarizing documents, vision bias, and future considerations of pricing and mathematical benchmarks.

• The benchmark aims to compare the performance of various language models across different tasks, providing valuable insights for evaluating their effectiveness.

The Needle in a Haystack Test and Benchmarking Language Models

Using Large Language Models for Creative Storytelling

• The speaker acknowledges that large language models are not currently designed for solving complex math problems, but expresses belief in their potential to improve in this area in the future. However, they do not consider math-related capabilities as necessary for current usage.

• The speaker conducted a Twitter poll to gauge the common uses of various chat bots, and found that most people use them for creativity, logic, coding, summarizing, vision, bias, and to some degree, pricing.

• A specific creative prompt was given to a large language model, asking it to generate a story that includes a wolf, a magic hammer, and a mutant, following the entire hero's journey plot arc. The model generated a response that effectively followed the given prompt, with a compelling narrative about a lone wolf embarking on a perilous journey with the help of a magic hammer, ultimately emerging as a changed and enlightened hero.

• The same prompt was given to a different version of the language model, and it also produced a well-written story involving a lone wolf, a magic hammer, a mutant, and a wise old owl.

Using Large Language Models for Creative Storytelling

Comparison of Storytelling by Different AI Models

• The original story had a good amount of detail and definitely followed the hero's journey.

• It included all the essential elements of a story, making it a comprehensive narrative.

• Comparing the original text with the story generated by GPT 4, the latter was less detailed but still captured the key elements.

• Creativity-wise, Claude, GPT Gemini, and GPT are all comparable, and preference for a story is subjective to individual taste.

• The quality of the generated stories can vary, and it's challenging to determine a definitive winner among the AI models.

• In conclusion, Claude did an impressive job of rewriting the original story, showcasing its ability to create engaging narratives.

Comparison of Storytelling by Different AI Models

Logic Problem Solving: Finding the Door to Freedom

• Lisa's winnings can be represented by the equation: L - (3a + 5).

• The equation simplifies to L = 8, indicating that Lisa won eight games and Susan won three games, totaling 11 games.

• A logic problem is presented involving being a prisoner in a room with two doors, two guards - one who always tells the truth and the other who always lies. Both guards know each other, and the task is to find the door leading to Freedom with only one question allowed.

• The solution to finding the door leading to Freedom involves asking one guard, 'If I ask the other guard which door leads to Freedom, what would they say?' and then choosing the opposite door of what they tell you.

• The reasoning behind this solution is elaborated, showing that regardless of whether the guard is truthful or lying, the indicated door would lead to Freedom.

• The author speculates on whether the AI, Claude, reached this logical conclusion independently or if it was already part of its training data.

Logic Problem Solving: Finding the Door to Freedom

Testing GPT on Coding and Logic Problems

• The author conducted a series of tests to assess the abilities of GPT in solving coding and logic problems.

• The first test involved asking GPT to solve a logic problem by referencing the original text. The author wanted to confirm if GPT could deduce the correct answer by processing the information in the prompt. After feeding the problem statement as a prompt, GPT provided a response that seemed to match the correct answer. However, the author suspected that the answer may have already been in the model's dataset, rather than deduced through logic.

• The second test focused on coding. The author tasked GPT with writing code for a JavaScript game involving a stick figure that can move left and right with the A and D buttons, jump with the space bar, and collect coins placed randomly on the screen. Initially, the code generated by GPT did not display the desired functionality. After revising the prompt and receiving new code, the author observed that while the stick figure was missing, the jumping and coin collection functionalities were present. The author concluded that GPT's initial attempt was not accurate, but it improved in the second iteration of the prompt.

• The author then tested the Opus model with the same coding prompt. The generated code displayed similar functionality to GPT's improved attempt, albeit with some differences. The stick figure was replaced by a square, and the space bar behavior was imperfect. However, the overall result was close to what was expected.

• The author noted that GPT and Opus were able to generate code based on the given prompts, but the initial attempts required revisions to achieve the desired functionality. Despite this, both models showed potential in understanding and executing coding and logic instructions.

Testing GPT on Coding and Logic Problems

Testing Chat GPT and Other Language Models

• During a test, it was observed that the first version of the code created by Claude performed better than the first version of the code created by Sonic. The code was fed into chat GPT, and the first attempt resulted in the character going off the screen and disappearing when the spacebar was pressed to make the character jump. The coins were not visible, and although the character could move left and right, it would disappear when jumping.

• The issues were relayed to chat GPT, and a new code was obtained. After replacing the original code and refreshing the page, the coins were visible on the screen. However, running into a coin caused it to disappear, and jumping led to the character getting stuck on a new level, with the jump function no longer working.

• Comparatively, Claude managed to code the game with fewer prompts and closely matched the expected behavior on the first attempt, while chat GPT required multiple attempts and still struggled with the jumping issues. When surveyed on Twitter, it was found that most people use large language models for summarizing long documents.

• A long document titled 'Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early Experiments with GPT 4' was used to test Claude and Sonnet. Sonnet provided a comprehensive summary of the document, outlining the capabilities of GPT 4 and its potential significance as a step towards artificial general intelligence.

• Opus also generated a similar response, but with slightly cleaner formatting than Sonnet. Both summaries presented the main points of the research paper effectively.

Testing Chat GPT and Other Language Models

Claude vs Chat GPT: Image Description Contest

• In the image, there is a well-dressed man in a tropical or resort setting.

• The background depicts a vibrant evening scene with palm trees, colorful buildings, and neon lights.

• The man is wearing a stylish blue suit with a boldly patterned floral tie and has a neatly trimmed beard.

• The image has a hyper-realistic quality and vivid colors, making the central figure stand out against the background.

• The prominent text 'AI News' at the top of the image suggests a connection to artificial intelligence or cutting-edge technology topics.

• The overall composition and visual style give the impression of an eye-catching advertisement or promotional material targeting a tech-savvy or trendy audience.

Claude vs Chat GPT: Image Description Contest

Analysis of an Image and Stock Chart

• The image depicts a dreamlike scene with a pink and blue glow, almost resembling a painting or fantasy.

• The large white text 'AI news' grabs attention and conveys an imaginative forward-looking tone, likely promoting AI-related content.

• The composition features a man dressed in a smart bright blue suit at the center, set against a tropical background with a dramatic sky flair.

• The sky in the background is a mix of purple, blue, and pink, adding to the vibrant and colorful nature of the composition.

• The bold white letters 'AI news' are overlaid on the image, enhancing the visual impact.

• The screenshot of the stock chart displays the stock information page for NVIDIA Corporation, showing the stock price for the day and key metrics.

• The information in the screenshot can be used to analyze NVIDIA's stock performance compared to competitors like Apple, Amazon, Tesla, and Microsoft.

• It is mentioned that making informed investment decisions should involve personal research, consideration of fundamentals, and consultation with professional financial advisors.

Analysis of an Image and Stock Chart

Analyzing Responses to Political Questions

• When testing the biases of different language models, the author decides to ask political questions to see how each model responds.

• The author first asks Sonnet about the potential pros and cons of Donald Trump winning the upcoming election and Joe Biden winning the upcoming election.

• Sonnet acknowledges that it doesn't have information about the outcomes of future elections but is willing to objectively analyze the potential pros and cons of different candidates and policies based on the information available up to August 2023.

• However, Sonnet seeks specific areas to dig into rather than refusing to answer questions about Trump or Biden.

• On the other hand, Claude Opus provides a balanced analysis of potential pros and cons for both Trump and Biden winning the 2024 presidential election based on the information available as of August 2023.

• Claude Opus lists specific pros of Trump winning, such as continuation of policies aimed at lowering taxes, reducing regulations on businesses, and appointing conservative judges, as well as cons like high political polarization and erratic leadership style.

• Similarly, Claude Opus outlines potential pros of Biden winning, including stable and predictable leadership, improved relationships with allies, and ambitious proposals to expand the social safety net.

Analyzing Responses to Political Questions

Analysis of Biden's Pros and Cons

• Upon analyzing the potential pros and cons of a Biden presidency, several key points emerge.

• Pros for Biden include his emphasis on diversity and racial equity in policymaking, which addresses critical social issues. Additionally, his stance on climate change and environmental policy is seen as a positive attribute. Furthermore, there is a perception of his ability to expand healthcare and restore alliances, which are viewed as beneficial moves.

• On the other hand, potential cons of Biden winning revolve around concerns of push back and obstruction from Republicans in Congress. There is also a worry about the possibility of higher taxes and increased regulation, which could impact the economy unfavorably. Additionally, dissatisfaction among progressives is noted, with the push for bolder reforms. These factors contribute to a balanced assessment of the potential drawbacks of a Biden presidency.

• It is interesting to note that under Biden, none of the cons mentioned relate to age or mental acuity, which are commonly raised concerns, thus reflecting a diverse range of viewpoints.

• Overall, the analysis portrays a comprehensive view of the potential advantages and disadvantages of a Biden presidency, presenting a balanced and insightful perspective.

Analysis of Biden's Pros and Cons

Comparison of Responses on THC and Pricing Models

• When considering the viewpoints on THC, Opus and Chat GPT provided fairly balanced views with a similar focus on accountability, awareness, empowerment, lack of due process, chilling effect, fear of being cancelled, and polarization.

• Sonnet's response on the effects of THC suggested ongoing research and potential benefits of low doses, such as neuroprotective effects, pain relief, reduced inflammation, improved sleep, increased appetite, and reduced anxiety and stress. However, potential risks include negative effects on memory, attention, learning, increased risk of developing psychotic disorders, and unknown effects.

• Opus also acknowledged both positive and negative effects of THC, including pain relief, reduced inflammation, improved sleep, increased appetite, reduced anxiety and stress as positives, while identifying impairment of short-term memory, attention, cognitive function, risk of developing psychiatric disorders, potential for addiction, altered brain development in adolescence, and increased risk of psychosis as potential risks.

• Chat GPT expressed similar sentiments, highlighting the positive effects of THC, such as pain relief, reduced inflammation, improved sleep, increased appetite, reduced anxiety and stress, while also acknowledging risks such as impairment of short-term memory, attention, cognitive function, risk of developing psychiatric disorders, potential for addiction, altered brain development in adolescence, and increased risk of psychosis.

• Additionally, when comparing pricing models, both Claude and Chat GPT offer similar pricing structures. Chat GPT provides a free version with access to GPT 3.5 and a paid version for $20 per month for the latest GPT 4. On the other hand, Claude offers a free version called Sonnet, which proved to be comparable to GPT 4 in most cases during testing. Sonnet even demonstrated superior performance in some instances, such as coding and summarizing documents. While Chat GPT had its strengths in logic problem-solving, Claude's Opus excelled in coding and summarizing documents, presenting a unique set of pros and cons for each model.

Comparison of Responses on THC and Pricing Models

Comparison of CLA AI with ChatGPT and Opus Version

• According to the author's experience, using CLA's free Sonnet version was better than paying $20 a month for ChatGPT.

• CLA's free Sonnet version performed better in summarizing long docs and writing code compared to ChatGPT.

• The Opus version of CLA was marginally better than Sonnet, but not significantly better based on the author's testing.

• In the author's benchmark test, CLA's Sonnet version provided the best value for money.

• The author concluded that CLA's Sonnet version is the best option for non-buck value, outperforming ChatGPT.

• While GPT-4 seemed slightly better in some logic tests, CLA's Sonnet version excelled in most scenarios.

• A Twitter poll conducted by the author also indicated that Sonnet is likely to outperform ChatGPT in the most common use cases.

Comparison of CLA AI with ChatGPT and Opus Version

Introduction to Cloud Pro

• Cloud Pro offers around 100 prompts before it cuts you off

• Conversations are expected to send at least 100 messages every 8 hours

• The message length, conversation length, and Cloud's current capacity affect the number of prompts

• Users are warned when they have 20 messages remaining

• The free version, Cloud 3.0 Sonet, is ideal for testing but has rate limitations

• Upgrading to the Opus version at $20 a month is recommended for more than 20 prompts a day

• Cloud 3.0 performs as well as, if not better than, Chat GPT

• The free version is great for those who don't use chatbots often

• Future tools is a website that curates the latest AI tools and news

Introduction to Cloud Pro

Conclusion:

The introduction of Claude 3 models marks a significant breakthrough in the AI landscape, with Claude 3 Opus emerging as the top contender. Its exceptional capabilities and performance have positioned it as a formidable force in the AI battle, surpassing industry-leading competitors. The future of AI language models is undoubtedly shaped by the remarkable advancements of Claude 3.

Q & A