Unveiling HR's Deceptive Practices: The Truth Revealed

The Nasty Tricks of Human Resources Revealed

• The so-called 'open door policy' touted by human resources is often used as a tool to suppress employee complaints and dissent.

• Many employees have discovered that their confidential complaints to HR were not kept private and were instead shared with the subject of the complaint, leading to retaliation and even termination.

• Human resources frequently utilize the open door policy as an early warning system to preemptively address and suppress employee complaints before they escalate.

• Employees are often misled to believe that they are legally protected from retaliation when utilizing the open door policy, when in fact, legal protection only applies to complaints protected by law.

The Nasty Tricks of Human Resources Revealed

Workplace Investigations: Unveiling the Truth

• Workplace investigations can be deceitful, especially when it comes to protecting the company's interests over the employees.

• When an employee approaches HR to report harassment or misconduct, the HR representative's primary allegiance is to the company, not the employee.

• HR launches an investigation not to seek the truth but to safeguard the company's interests. This often involves manipulating information and evidence to favor the company.

• The HR rep may strategically avoid documenting certain details or interviews that support the employee's claims in order to protect the company's image and minimize legal risks.

• Employee participation in the investigation is crucial, despite knowing that the HR investigation is biased. Refusal to participate could harm the employee's position in potential legal proceedings.

• Employees must be aware of how their actions during the investigation may be perceived by a jury in future litigation. It's essential to navigate the process strategically to protect one's interests.

Workplace Investigations: Unveiling the Truth

The Deceptive Practices of HR: Unveiling the Truth

• HR may lie to employees in various situations, such as write-ups and performance improvement plans.

• During lawsuits, HR representatives often lie to protect their job and their company.

• The practice of arbitration is considered the worst trick, which has cost millions of Americans billions of dollars.

• HR has no legal requirement to be truthful, which can lead to them prioritizing their company's interests over the employees'.

• Defamation law in employment does not have strong repercussions, allowing HR to get away with lying in certain situations.

• Employees can hold HR accountable by seeking legal representation to properly impeach them during a lawsuit.

• The speaker offers free consultation for California workers who believe they have a case for harassment, retaliation, discrimination, or wrongful termination.

• Contacting the speaker should be considered if the mentioned criteria apply to the individual seeking assistance.

The Deceptive Practices of HR: Unveiling the Truth

The Deceptive Practice of Mandatory Arbitration Agreements in the Workplace

• Many employees are unaware of the implications of signing an arbitration agreement when they join a company.

• Arbitration agreements are often buried within the employee handbook, and employees are required to sign an acknowledgment page agreeing to its terms.

• The agreement restricts employees from suing the company in public court and forces them into private arbitration.

• During arbitration, the employee's case is judged by an arbitrator paid by the company, raising concerns about neutrality and fairness.

• Employment lawyers emphasize that arbitration significantly reduces the value of employee cases, favoring the company.

• On a broader scale, the use of arbitration results in billions of dollars of lost value for employees nationwide.

The Deceptive Practice of Mandatory Arbitration Agreements in the Workplace

The Impact of Arbitration Agreements on Employee Rights

• Arbitration agreements often restrict employees from pursuing legal action against their employers on a class-wide basis.

• This limitation significantly hinders the ability of employees to address smaller claims, such as unpaid overtime or wage theft, as the costs of individual legal proceedings may outweigh the value of the claims.

• The prevalence of arbitration agreements results in tens of billions of dollars of employee money being lost each year, as these smaller claims go unaddressed.

• Arbitration also serves as a tool for employers to minimize the impact of harassment, retaliation, and wrongful termination claims, further jeopardizing employee rights.

• A lack of transparency and accountability in the arbitration process allows companies to effectively evade consequences for unethical or illegal treatment of their employees.

The Impact of Arbitration Agreements on Employee Rights

Conclusion:

It's essential for employees to be aware of HR's deceptive practices and their impact on rights. By understanding these tactics, individuals can take action to protect themselves and seek legal representation when necessary.

Q & A